From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Vergari v. Marcus

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 18, 1970
26 N.Y.2d 764 (N.Y. 1970)

Opinion

Argued January 14, 1970

Decided February 18, 1970

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, ROBERT E. DEMPSEY, J.

Gordon Miller, County Attorney ( Arthur T. Connick of counsel), for appellant.

Samuel S. Slavitt and William Scott, II for respondent.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General ( Arlene R. Silverman and Samuel A. Hirshowitz of counsel), amicus curiae.


MEMORANDUM. Cases involving judicial proceedings for forfeiture of penalties were tried by jury before the adoption of the 1846 Constitution ( Colon v. Lisk, 13 App. Div. 195, affd. 153 N.Y. 188; see, also, People ex rel. Lemon v. Elmore, 256 N.Y. 489, 493; 4 Lincoln, Constitutional History of New York, p. 50; 44 N Y Jur., Penalties and Forfeitures, §§ 7, 16). Therefore, section 2 of article I of the State Constitution guarantees the right to a jury trial in this forfeiture proceeding ( Blum v. Fresh Grown Preserve Corp., 292 N.Y. 241, 244; Wynehamer v. People, 13 N.Y. 378, 426). Lawton v. Steele ( 119 N.Y. 226, affd. 152 U.S. 133), permitting the summary destruction of property of small value in order to abate a nuisance, is not applicable. The instant statute does not prohibit trial by jury; indeed it does not detail any of the proceedings to be followed. Hence it was incumbent on the court to provide the appropriate proceedings, including a jury trial mandated by the Constitution. The Supreme Court deprived respondent of his constitutional right by failing to afford respondent a jury trial. Accordingly, the order of the Appellate Division should be modified and the case remitted to Supreme Court, Westchester County, for a trial by jury.

Chief Judge FULD and Judges SCILEPPI, BERGAN, BREITEL, JASEN and GIBSON concur; Judge BURKE taking no part.

Order modified in accordance with the memorandum herein and, as so modified, affirmed, with costs.


Summaries of

Matter of Vergari v. Marcus

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 18, 1970
26 N.Y.2d 764 (N.Y. 1970)
Case details for

Matter of Vergari v. Marcus

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of CARL A. VERGARI, as District Attorney of Westchester…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Feb 18, 1970

Citations

26 N.Y.2d 764 (N.Y. 1970)
309 N.Y.S.2d 204
257 N.E.2d 652

Citing Cases

Swails v. State

Although no Georgia authorities have addressed whether a party has a constitutional right to a jury trial in…

State v. One 1990 Honda Accord

In general, these courts reason that their state constitutions preserve the common-law right to trial by jury…