From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Vasquez v. State Parole Board

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 12, 1997
240 A.D.2d 823 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

June 12, 1997

Appeal from the Supreme Court (Berke, J.).


Petitioner is serving a prison term of 15 years to life following his 1978 conviction of the crimes of murder in the second degree, attempted murder in the second degree and absconding from temporary release. Although petitioner challenges the denial of his application for parole release, such decisions are discretionary and will not be disturbed so long as they satisfy the statutory requirements (see, Executive Law § 259-i; see also, Matter of Walker v. New York State Div. of Parole, 203 A.D.2d 757) and there is no showing of either error or "irrationality bordering on impropriety" (Matter of Russo v. New York State Bd. of Parole, 50 N.Y.2d 69, 77). Our review of the record discloses that these requirements were met by respondent's consideration of petitioner's application, with a special emphasis placed upon the fact that petitioner had committed a murder while on furlough from a previous term of incarceration. As a final matter, we are unpersuaded that this Court's decision in Matter of Marturano v. Hammock ( 87 A.D.2d 732, lv denied 56 N.Y.2d 506) does not reflect the current state of the law.

Mikoll, J.P., Mercure, White, Yesawich Jr. and Peters, JJ., concur.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

Matter of Vasquez v. State Parole Board

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 12, 1997
240 A.D.2d 823 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Matter of Vasquez v. State Parole Board

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JOSE VASQUEZ, Appellant, v. NEW YORK STATE PAROLE BOARD…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jun 12, 1997

Citations

240 A.D.2d 823 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
658 N.Y.S.2d 538

Citing Cases

Matter of Guerin v. State Div. of Parole

In our view, Supreme Court correctly concluded that further judicial review of the Board's determination is…