From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Van Alstyne

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 1, 1911
143 App. Div. 962 (N.Y. App. Div. 1911)

Opinion

March, 1911.


The notice of appeal stated that the appellant intended to bring up the facts for review under section 2586 of the Code of Civil Procedure. This was notice to the respondent of the importance of settling into the case his objections and exceptions. Many of his objections and exceptions are so settled, but it appears now from the affidavits that some important ones were omitted. A reargument, therefore, is made proper by this omission, and he asks to be relieved from the effect thereof. A reargument is granted upon condition that the respondent pay to the appellant all costs and disbursements made since the notice of appeal was served, with $150 in addition thereto. All concurred, except Houghton, J., dissenting as to the $150; Betts, J., not sitting. Reargument granted upon condition that the respondent pay to the appellant all costs and disbursements made since the notice of appeal was served, with $150 in addition thereto.


Summaries of

Matter of Van Alstyne

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 1, 1911
143 App. Div. 962 (N.Y. App. Div. 1911)
Case details for

Matter of Van Alstyne

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of LAURA L. VAN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Mar 1, 1911

Citations

143 App. Div. 962 (N.Y. App. Div. 1911)