From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Valin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Aug 22, 2001
286 A.D.2d 566 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

CAE 01-01748. (Erie Co.)

Filed August 22, 2001.

Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Joslin, J. — Election Law.

PRESENT: PIGOTT, JR., P.J., GREEN, PINE, WISNER AND LAWTON, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum:

Supreme Court properly dismissed as time-barred this special proceeding brought pursuant to Election Law § 16-102, seeking to invalidate certificates of authorization filed on behalf of respondents and to invalidate the underlying designation of respondents' candidacies in the Independence Party primary election to be held on September 11, 2001. Petitioners contend that the certificates of authorization are null and void because they were not issued by the appropriate party committee and individuals. A proceeding seeking to challenge the election of officers at a party committee meeting must be brought within 10 days after the meeting is held ( see, Election Law § 16-102). It is undisputed that petitioners failed to do so here, and thus this proceeding is untimely ( see, Matter of Green v. Kapsis, ___ A.D.2d ___ [decided May 14, 2001]). "Since Election Law § 16-102 (1) provides a remedy for the relief sought by petitioners, they cannot avoid the time requirement of the statute by initiating a new and different proceeding" ( Matter of Scaringe v. Ackerman, 119 A.D.2d 327, 329, affd 68 N.Y.2d 885). The contention of petitioners that they were not aggrieved until the certificates of authorization were filed is without merit ( see, Matter of Krupczak v. Mancini, 153 A.D.2d 785, 786; cf., Gdanski v. Rockland County Bd. of Elections, 97 A.D.2d 744). In any event, were we to review the merits of this proceeding, we would conclude that it was properly dismissed. In the absence of illegality, there is no basis for judicial interference with the internal workings of a party ( see, Matter of Danielewicz v Aurigema, 90 A.D.2d 667, appeal dismissed 58 N.Y.2d 881).


Summaries of

Matter of Valin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Aug 22, 2001
286 A.D.2d 566 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Matter of Valin

Case Details

Full title:MATTER OF CHRISTINA VALIN AND LAURA MURPHY, PETITIONERS-APPELLANTS, v…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Aug 22, 2001

Citations

286 A.D.2d 566 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
730 N.Y.S.2d 464

Citing Cases

Master v. Pohanka

The within proceeding is barred by the statute of limitations. ( Matter of Pecoraro v State Comm. of…

Wohl v. Rockland Cnty. Republican Comm.

We have stated that a petition challenging "the validity" of a county committee must be commenced "within 10…