From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Claim of Valentine v. Smith, Angevine & Co.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 11, 1916
111 N.E. 1102 (N.Y. 1916)

Opinion

Argued November 15, 1915

Decided January 11, 1916

Merwyn H. Nellis, Andrew J. Nellis and James B. Henney for appellants.

Egburt E. Woodbury, Attorney-General ( E.C. Aiken of counsel), for respondent.


Order affirmed, with costs, on opinion in Matter of Post v. Burger Gohlke ( 216 N.Y. 544).

Concur: WILLARD BARTLETT, Ch. J., HISCOCK, CHASE, COLLIN, CARDOZO, SEABURY and POUND, JJ.


Summaries of

Claim of Valentine v. Smith, Angevine & Co.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 11, 1916
111 N.E. 1102 (N.Y. 1916)
Case details for

Claim of Valentine v. Smith, Angevine & Co.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of MIKE VALENTINE, Respondent, against SMITH…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jan 11, 1916

Citations

111 N.E. 1102 (N.Y. 1916)
111 N.E. 1102