From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Valdes v. Selsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Feb 24, 2000
269 A.D.2d 710 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

February 24, 2000

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Chemung County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Jose C. Valdes, Attica, petitioner in person.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney-General (Wayne L. Benjamin of counsel), Albany, for respondent.

Before: CARDONA, P.J., CREW III, PETERS, CARPINELLO and MUGGLIN, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

After conducting a search of petitioner's cell, correction officers found a shank in a hollowed-out piece of wood attached to the wall. Following a tier III hearing, petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rule prohibiting inmates from possessing weapons. In our view, the detailed misbehavior report and the testimony of the two correction officers stating that no one occupied petitioner's cell in his absence provide substantial evidence supporting the determination of petitioner's guilt (see, Matter of Vasquez v. Goord, 263 A.D.2d 819, 694 N.Y.S.2d 799; Matter of Caraway v. Walker, 247 A.D.2d 675). Although petitioner denies that the weapon was his, an inference of possession arises inasmuch as it was found within a cell that petitioner had occupied for at least three consecutive weeks (see,Matter of Ebanks v. Goord, 263 A.D.2d 588, 693 N.Y.S.2d 675; Matter of Tarbell v. Goord, 263 A.D.2d 563, 693 N.Y.S.2d 262). Petitioner's remaining contentions have been reviewed and found to be without merit.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Matter of Valdes v. Selsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Feb 24, 2000
269 A.D.2d 710 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Matter of Valdes v. Selsky

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JOSE C. VALDES, Petitioner, v. DONALD SELSKY, as Director…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Feb 24, 2000

Citations

269 A.D.2d 710 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
704 N.Y.S.2d 673

Citing Cases

In the Matter of Tominaro v. Goord

While petitioner asserts that other inmates had access to the area where the weapon was found, this is…

In the Matter of Bunting v. Goord

We are unpersuaded by petitioner's contention that because his cell was not searched prior to him moving in,…