From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Utica Mutual Insurance Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 28, 1995
214 A.D.2d 980 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

April 28, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Monroe County, Galloway, J.

Present — Pine, J.P., Lawton, Wesley, Callahan and Davis, JJ.


Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and petition granted. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in denying the petition for a stay of arbitration of respondent's claim on behalf of Edward and April Leno for uninsured motorists coverage under the commercial umbrella liability policy issued by petitioner to Business Services Company of Utica. That policy contains no provision for the arbitration of disputes and affords no uninsured motorists coverage. Rather, it affords excess and extended liability coverage to insureds for damages owing to third parties. Moreover, contrary to the conclusion reached by the court, the commercial umbrella liability policy's incorporation of the "same terms, conditions, agreements, exclusions and definitions as the 'underlying insurance' except with respec[t] to any provision to the contrary contained in this insurance", did not extend to the provisions for uninsured motorists coverage contained in the underlying insurance policy (see, Matter of Matarasso [Continental Cas. Co.], 56 N.Y.2d 264, 268). Thus, there was no provision in petitioner's policy to support the conclusion of the court that respondent's claim was subject to arbitration.

Furthermore, the alternative grounds urged by respondent to support denial of a stay of arbitration lack merit. The application for the stay was timely (see, CPLR 7503 [c]), and there is no support in the record for respondent's assertion that the existence of the commercial umbrella liability policy was concealed by petitioner. In any event, where, as here, there is no agreement to arbitrate, the insurance carrier is not barred by its failure to move to stay arbitration within the required 20-day statutory period (see, Matter of Matarasso [Continental Cas. Co.], supra, at 266; Matter of Steck [State Farm Ins. Co.], 213 A.D.2d 1051).


Summaries of

Matter of Utica Mutual Insurance Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 28, 1995
214 A.D.2d 980 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Matter of Utica Mutual Insurance Company

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Arbitration Between UTICA MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Apr 28, 1995

Citations

214 A.D.2d 980 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
626 N.Y.S.2d 914

Citing Cases

Herdendorf v. Geico Insurance Company

Supreme Court denied the motion, and we affirm. At the outset, we agree with defendants that the umbrella…