Opinion
June, 1910.
Present — Ingraham, P.J. (dissenting), Laughlin, Clarke, Scott and Miller, JJ.
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion.
I dissent upon the ground that this examination is not connected with any of the provisions of article 2 of the Debtor and Creditor Law, and that to justify an examination under section 22 of that article it is necessary that the object of the proceeding should be to carry into effect some provision of the article. (See Matter of Holbrook, 99 N.Y. 539.)