From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Underhill

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 1, 1920
193 App. Div. 957 (N.Y. App. Div. 1920)

Opinion

October, 1920.


Appeal dismissed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. An appeal from an order denying a motion for reargument cannot be entertained by this court. The court which hears the original motion can alone judge whether it has failed to consider any of the points raised upon a motion, and its determination upon such a point must be final. ( Matter of Grout, 83 Hun, 25; Harding v. Conlon, 146 App. Div. 842; Peterson v. Felt, 61 id. 176; Tucker v. Dudley, 104 id. 191.) Jenks, P.J., Mills, Rich, Putnam and Kelly, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Underhill

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 1, 1920
193 App. Div. 957 (N.Y. App. Div. 1920)
Case details for

Matter of Underhill

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Estate of JERONEMUS S. UNDERHILL, Deceased. AUGUSTA…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 1, 1920

Citations

193 App. Div. 957 (N.Y. App. Div. 1920)

Citing Cases

McEnery v. Long Island College Hospital

Appeal dismissed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. (See Matter of Underhill, 193 App. Div. 957.)…

Fabiano v. Country-Wide Insurance Co.

The plaintiff has no right to a money judgment reflecting interest on allegedly overdue no-fault benefits…