From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Turdo v. Rubin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 21, 1980
77 A.D.2d 608 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)

Opinion

July 21, 1980


Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to compel the respondent to accept the petitioner's plea of guilty to the offense of unlawful possession of marihuana in satisfaction of Indictment No. 78-00307-01, filed by the Grand Jury of Westchester County, which names petitioner as a defendant. Proceeding dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements. In People v. Turdo ( 74 A.D.2d 614) we reinstated the entire indictment against petitioner. We did not, and indeed could not, reduce the crime charged to a lesser included offense (see CPL 210.20, subd 1, par [b]; People v. Maier, 72 A.D.2d 754). Petitioner is not entitled, as a matter of right, to plead guilty to a lesser included offense of the crime charged (see CPL 220.10, subd 3). Relief in the nature of mandamus will not lie where the petitioner has no legal right to the relief sought (CPLR 7803, subd 1; Matter of Association of Surrogates Supreme Ct. Reporters within City of N Y v. Bartlett, 40 N.Y.2d 571, 574). Mollen, P.J., Hopkins, Titone and Mangano, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Turdo v. Rubin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 21, 1980
77 A.D.2d 608 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)
Case details for

Matter of Turdo v. Rubin

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of DOMINIC TURDO, Petitioner, v. ISAAC RUBIN, as Justice of…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 21, 1980

Citations

77 A.D.2d 608 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)

Citing Cases

Jones v. N.Y.C. Hous. Pres.

The acts which the petitioner seeks to compel the respondent to perform in this case are not duties enjoined…

Schachter v. Quinones

Contrary to the petitioner's present contentions, the Supreme Court, Kings County, properly dismissed the…