From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Tschaepe v. Albee Godfrey-Whale Creek

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 23, 1942
264 App. Div. 961 (N.Y. App. Div. 1942)

Opinion

September 23, 1942.

Appeal from State Industrial Board.


The Industrial Board Member in his memorandum of decision stated that the entire record in cases referable to other accidents sustained by claimant had been considered and that based thereon and on the weight of medical evidence, the record sustained the determination of the Referee. Questions of fact were presented and there is ample evidence to support the State Industrial Board's finding. In the circumstances the decision of the State Industrial Board denying additional compensation to the claimant for additional disability should be affirmed. Decision affirmed, without costs. Crapser, Heffernan, Schenck and Foster, JJ., concur; Hill, P.J., dissents on the ground that there is no medical evidence on behalf of the carrier. The statement made by Dr. Kahn was without probative force in view of the testimony given by claimant's witnesses. The presumption is abrogated when the affidavit is controverted by common-law proof. ( Matter of Magna v. Hegeman Harris Co., 258 N.Y. 82).


Summaries of

Matter of Tschaepe v. Albee Godfrey-Whale Creek

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 23, 1942
264 App. Div. 961 (N.Y. App. Div. 1942)
Case details for

Matter of Tschaepe v. Albee Godfrey-Whale Creek

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of KURT TSCHAEPE, Appellant, against ALBEE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Sep 23, 1942

Citations

264 App. Div. 961 (N.Y. App. Div. 1942)