From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Tsapatoris v. G.L.M. Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 30, 1981
81 A.D.2d 728 (N.Y. App. Div. 1981)

Opinion

April 30, 1981


Appeal from a decision of the Workers' Compensation Board, filed September 20, 1979, which determined that claimant's injuries did not arise out of and in the course of his employment and hence were not compensable. Claimant, a construction worker who operated heavy equipment, was involved in a motor vehicle accident and severely injured. The accident occurred at about 6:45 A.M. while he was en route to the employment site, located some 10 miles from his home. On this particular job, his regular working hours were from 7:00 A.M. to 3:30 P.M. At the time of the accident, he was alone, driving his own personal vehicle. Concededly, he received no allowance or reimbursement for travel expenses. Despite his contrary contention, it does not indisputably appear that use of his vehicle was a requirement or condition of his employment on that day (see Matter of Freebern v North Rockland CDA, 64 A.D.2d 300) or that the personal tools he carried in his car were for anything other than his own convenience. There being substantial evidence in the record to sustain the board's determination, we must affirm (Matter of Wojnar v New York State Thruway Auth., 56 A.D.2d 947; Matter of Lutgen v Conte Elec., 50 A.D.2d 624). Decision affirmed, without costs. Sweeney, J.P., Main, Casey, Mikoll and Yesawich, Jr., JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Tsapatoris v. G.L.M. Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 30, 1981
81 A.D.2d 728 (N.Y. App. Div. 1981)
Case details for

Matter of Tsapatoris v. G.L.M. Corporation

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of THOMAS TSAPATORIS, Appellant, v. G.L.M…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Apr 30, 1981

Citations

81 A.D.2d 728 (N.Y. App. Div. 1981)

Citing Cases

Matter of Junium v. A.L. Bazzini Company, Inc.

Although this was a regular work day and decedent would routinely drive to work or to the train station, the…