From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Trunzo v. Regan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 29, 1982
87 A.D.2d 955 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)

Opinion

April 29, 1982


Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court at Special Term, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the State Comptroller which denied petitioner's application for accidental disability retirement.


Petitioner, the Chief of Police for the Village of Northport, New York, filed an application for accidental disability retirement on February 13, 1980. The application was based upon physical disability to perform his duties resulting from lifting and carrying automobile tires on two occasions. Specifically, in his application, petitioner stated that on April 17, 1974, it became necessary for him to replace all four tires on his police vehicle. In order to do so petitioner and another officer carried two tires each up the steps of the police building basement and he injured his back. Petitioner stated that he originally injured his back some two weeks before when he helped roll and stack tires in the basement. Respondent disapproved petitioner's application on the ground that the incidents in question did not constitute accidents within the meaning of that term as used in section 363 Retire. Soc. Sec. of the Retirement and Social Security Law. This proceeding ensued. Whether an accident occurred within the meaning of section 363 Retire. Soc. Sec. of the Retirement and Social Security Law is a factual issue which is within the "exclusive authority" of the Comptroller to determine (Retirement and Social Security Law, § 374). If the Comptroller's determination is supported by substantial evidence, it must be sustained ( Matter of Croshier v. Levitt, 5 N.Y.2d 259; Matter of Kuter v. Regan, 81 A.D.2d 941; Matter of Tremblay v. Levitt, 65 A.D.2d 901). The present record contains substantial evidence from which the Comptroller could find that petitioner's injury resulted from the performance of his duties and did not constitute an accidental injury (see Matter of Tremblay v Levitt, 65 A.D.2d 901, supra). Accordingly, the Comptroller's determination must be confirmed. Determination confirmed, and petition dismissed, without costs. Kane, J.P., Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., Weiss and Levine, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Trunzo v. Regan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 29, 1982
87 A.D.2d 955 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)
Case details for

Matter of Trunzo v. Regan

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JOHN P. TRUNZO, Petitioner, v. EDWARD V. REGAN, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Apr 29, 1982

Citations

87 A.D.2d 955 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)

Citing Cases

Matter of Smith v. N.Y. St. Policemen's

He also contends that the retirement system violated his due process rights when it engaged his personal…

Matter of Hoyt v. Regan

He further testified that he had administered resuscitation himself and witnessed application of the maneuver…