Opinion
June 12, 1995
Appeal from the Family Court, Kings County (Schechter, J.).
Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The appellant's contention that he was deprived of his right to a speedy dispositional hearing is unpreserved for appellate review (see, e.g., Matter of Michael P., 213 A.D.2d 717; Matter of Eugene S., 200 A.D.2d 574; Matter of Ralph D., 163 A.D.2d 752) and, in any event, without merit (see, Matter of Michael P., supra; Matter of Kasheen A., 197 A.D.2d 572).
The appellant's challenge to the severity of his placement is academic. Bracken, J.P., Rosenblatt, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.