From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Tripp

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 16, 1949
275 App. Div. 36 (N.Y. App. Div. 1949)

Opinion

March 16, 1949.

Appeal from Supreme Court, Erie County, BATT, J.

Nathaniel L. Goldstein, Attorney-General ( Wendell P. Brown, Solicitor-General, and Margaret D. Hazel, Assistant Attorney-General of counsel), for Department of Mental Hygiene of State of New York, appellant.

Davis, Townsend, McElvein Potter for Leland G. Davis, respondent.

James L. Crane, special guardian, respondent in person.

Present — TAYLOR, P.J., McCURN, LOVE, KIMBALL and PIPER, JJ.


The incompetent's aunt, of whose estate the incompetent inherited a one-fourth share, died on December 11, 1941. The incompetent's committee was appointed on June 23, 1942. Although there was no committee in existence to obtain possession of the inheritance until after the repeal of the former section 24-a of the Mental Hygiene Law on May 8, 1942, nevertheless the inheritance vested in the incompetent upon the death of her aunt ( Matter of Hilliard, 164 Misc. 677, 692; Matter of Cusimano, 173 Misc. 382, 383; 26 C.J.S., Descent and Distribution, § 65). Upon the death of her aunt the incompetent therefore became subject to any liability imposed by former section 24-a of the Mental Hygiene Law (L. 1940, ch. 805). That section provided for reimbursement to the State for the cost of maintenance of inmates in State institutions under circumstances specified therein, and subdivision 2 read in part as follows: "If the property of such patient or inmate is sufficient the committee shall pay for institutional maintenance incurred prior to the appointment of the committee."

The State became entitled to reimbursement pursuant to former section 24-a of the Mental Hygiene Law (see Matter of Hofmann, 261 App. Div. 556). Such right already accrued, was not lost to the State by the repeal of that section and the enactment of a new section by chapter 747 of the Laws of 1942 effective May 8, 1942 (General Construction Law, § 93).

The order insofar as appealed from, should be reversed on the law and the claim allowed in the sum of $2,743.68, without costs.

All concur.


Order, so far as appealed from, reversed on the law, without costs of this appeal to any party, and claim allowed in the sum of $2,743.68, without costs.


Summaries of

Matter of Tripp

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 16, 1949
275 App. Div. 36 (N.Y. App. Div. 1949)
Case details for

Matter of Tripp

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of HELEN TRIPP, an Incompetent Person. LELAND G. DAVIS, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Mar 16, 1949

Citations

275 App. Div. 36 (N.Y. App. Div. 1949)
87 N.Y.S.2d 137

Citing Cases

Estate of Phipps

" (P. 432 [26 N.Y.S.2d].) Based on that decision and again without any discussion of the matter, the court in…

Rodriguez v. City of New York

The court's interpretation of the statutory scheme is consistent with New York decisional law upholding the…