From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Morales

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 8, 1992
188 A.D.2d 350 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

December 8, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Irma Vidal Santaella, J.).


The police accident report of the officer, who witnessed the instant car chase and "intentional" ramming of the police vehicle in which Officer Morales was a passenger, was properly admitted into evidence as an exception to the hearsay rule pursuant to CPLR 4518 (a) (see, Yeargans v Yeargans, 24 A.D.2d 280). Moreover, the officers/witnesses' statements concerning the intentional nature of the incident were correctly considered by the court since the officers were trained experts in accident investigation. Finally, under the circumstances the court's conclusion that this was not a covered "accident" was neither against the weight of the evidence nor contrary to law.

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Milonas, Kupferman and Ross, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Morales

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 8, 1992
188 A.D.2d 350 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

Matter of Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Morales

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY, Respondent, v. LEWIS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 8, 1992

Citations

188 A.D.2d 350 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
591 N.Y.S.2d 27

Citing Cases

Ameriprise Ins. Co. v. Hampton

Thus, the rule in [New York] and in other jurisdictions is that [w]hether or not a certain result is…

Utica Mut. Ins. Co. v. Cullum

This court finds that giving Emmerich's trained opinion some weight (Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Morales, 188…