From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Transportation Insurance v. Mueller

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 24, 2000
268 A.D.2d 526 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Submitted November 17, 1999

January 24, 2000

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to stay arbitration of an underinsured motorist claim, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Underwood, J.), dated December 18, 1998, which, in effect, granted the respondent's motion to vacate a prior order of the same court dated December 8, 1997, granting the petition upon the respondent's default in appearing, and directed the parties to proceed with the arbitration.

Feeney, Gayoso Fitzpatrick, LLP, Nesconset, N.Y. (Tony A. Gayoso of counsel), for appellant.

Kujawski Dellicarpini, Deer Park, N.Y. (Bryan P. Kujawski of counsel), for respondent.

CORNELIUS J. O'BRIEN, J.P., THOMAS R. SULLIVAN, GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, DANIEL F. LUCIANO, SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order dated December 18, 1998, is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is denied, and the order dated December 8, 1997, is reinstated.

It is well settled that a party seeking to vacate a default must demonstrate both a meritorious claim and a reasonable excuse for the default (see, CPLR 5015[a][1]; Matter of Atlantic Mut. Ins. Co. v. Shaw, 222 A.D.2d 581 ). Here, the respondent's motion failed to establish these requirements. In any event, the petitioner was entitled to a stay of arbitration, as the offset provision is enforceable (see, Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. [Stolarz-New Jersey Mfrs. Ins. Co.], 81 N.Y.2d 219 ). The fact that the offset provision was not contained in the declaration page of the policy would not warrant a contrary conclusion (see, Matter of Government Employs. Ins. Co. v. O'Haire, 247 A.D.2d 387; cf., 11 NYCRR 60-2.3[a][2] [requiring offset provision to be on declaration page of policies effective after October 1, 1993]).

O'BRIEN, J.P., SULLIVAN, GOLDSTEIN, LUCIANO, and FEUERSTEIN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Transportation Insurance v. Mueller

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 24, 2000
268 A.D.2d 526 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Matter of Transportation Insurance v. Mueller

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF TRANSPORTATION INSURANCE COMPANY, appellant, v. KYLE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 24, 2000

Citations

268 A.D.2d 526 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
701 N.Y.S.2d 655

Citing Cases

In the Matter of Eidelkind v. Winter

Although the Supreme Court incorrectly characterized his motion as one for reargument, the motion was…