From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Town of Brookhaven v. Reith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 19, 1998
254 A.D.2d 426 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

October 19, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Werner, J.).


Ordered that the judgment and the order and judgment are affirmed, with one bill of costs.

The award of $27,000 to the claimant as just compensation for the taking of his property was supported by sufficient evidence ( see, Matter of Village of Johnson City [Waldo's, Inc.], 241 A.D.2d 874; Matter of City of Albany [Brown Equip. Co.], 199 A.D.2d 746; Matter of City of New York v. Estate of Levine, 196 A.D.2d 654; Chase Manhattan Bank v. State of New York, 103 A.D.2d 211). Although the court should have admitted the rebuttal evidence proffered by the claimant, any error in this regard was harmless ( see, Matter of Village of Hilton v. Edelman, 83 A.D.2d 767; see also, City of Batavia v. Bolas, 174 A.D.2d 993).

Pursuant to Eminent Domain Procedure Law § 304 (H), the Town of Brookhaven is entitled to the return of its excess advance payment of $3,000.

Bracken, J. P., Copertino, Thompson and Friedmann, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Town of Brookhaven v. Reith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 19, 1998
254 A.D.2d 426 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Matter of Town of Brookhaven v. Reith

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of TOWN OF BROOKHAVEN, Respondent, v. RONALD REITH, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 19, 1998

Citations

254 A.D.2d 426 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
678 N.Y.S.2d 746

Citing Cases

In re City of New York

" Thus, pursuant to this provision, a condemnor is entitled to the return of an excess advance payment ( see…