From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Torres v. New York St. Comptroller

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 15, 1993
192 A.D.2d 861 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

April 15, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Albany County.


We reject petitioner's contention that respondent Comptroller erred in denying her applications for accidental and ordinary disability retirement benefits. Although the medical experts testifying at the hearings agreed that petitioner had chronic back sprain and a bulging disc at the L4-L5 and L5-S1 levels, they disagreed regarding the significance of these findings. Petitioner's expert opined that the bulge was significant while the expert for respondent State and Local Employees' Retirement System concluded that the bulging was not unusual and presented no problem. The experts also differed as to petitioner's prognosis. Her physician stated that she was permanently incapacitated from performing her duties as a groundskeeper. The Retirement System's physician testified to the contrary. It was for the Comptroller to evaluate the conflicting medical evidence (see, Matter of Ramseur v Regan, 154 A.D.2d 869) and it was within his authority to accord greater weight to the testimony of one physician over another (see, Matter of Walker v Regan, 97 A.D.2d 878). Because we find substantial evidence in the record to support the Comptroller's determination, it must be upheld (see, Matter of Heavey v Regan, 161 A.D.2d 917).

Mikoll, J.P., Yesawich Jr., Mercure and Crew III, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Matter of Torres v. New York St. Comptroller

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 15, 1993
192 A.D.2d 861 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

Matter of Torres v. New York St. Comptroller

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of BELEN TORRES, Petitioner, v. NEW YORK STATE COMPTROLLER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Apr 15, 1993

Citations

192 A.D.2d 861 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
596 N.Y.S.2d 499

Citing Cases

Matter of Sullivan v. Regan

In his opinion this condition was not related to the automobile accident since, based on his experience and…

Matter of Rossiello v. Regan

Both experts agreed that petitioner is disabled at the present time and unable to perform any work. It is…