From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tobi F. v. Bruce N.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 1, 1996
229 A.D.2d 392 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

July 1, 1996

Appeal from the Family Court, Dutchess County (Pagones, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The petitioner's contention that the Family Court improperly denied her motion to compel the respondent to respond to written interrogatories is without merit. It is well established that a respondent in a paternity proceeding cannot be compelled to testify or produce evidence, including responses to interrogatories, at the pretrial discovery stage ( see, Matter of Margaret B. v Gilbert W., 41 N.Y.2d 971, revg 51 A.D.2d 456, on dissenting opn of Capozzoli, J.).

Further, there is no merit to the petitioner's contention that the Family Court improperly excluded the results of a DNA blood test gratuitously performed by the testing laboratory. A court order required the respondent to submit only to a human leucocyte antigen (HLA) blood test. Thus, the results of the gratuitously-performed DNA test were inadmissible as they were beyond the scope of that court order ( see, Matter of Department of Social Servs. [Ruth M.H.] v. Joseph N., 159 Misc.2d 833, 836).

In any event, DNA tests must be performed by a "duly qualified physician or by a laboratory duly approved for this purpose by the commissioner of health" (Family Ct Act § 532 [a], as amended by L 1994, ch 170, § 354; see also, Matter of Leon L. v. Carole H., 210 A.D.2d 484). In this case, the DNA testing was not done by a duly-approved laboratory ( see, Matter of Barbara A.M. v. Gerard J.M., 178 A.D.2d 412; Matter of Department of Social Servs. [Ruth M.H.] v. Joseph N., supra; cf., Matter of Leon L. v. Carole H., supra).

The Family Court properly found that the petitioner did not meet her burden of establishing paternity by clear and convincing evidence. There is no basis on this record for substituting this Court's judgment for that of the Family Court, which saw and heard the witnesses ( see, Matter of Sherry G. v. George F., 183 A.D.2d 825; Department of Social Servs. [Beatrice V.P.] v. Trustum C.D., 97 A.D.2d 831; see generally, Matter of Commissioner of Social Servs. [Patricia A.] v. Philip De G., 59 N.Y.2d 137).

The petitioner's remaining contentions are without merit. Pizzuto, J.P., Santucci, Altman and Hart, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Tobi F. v. Bruce N.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 1, 1996
229 A.D.2d 392 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Tobi F. v. Bruce N.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of TOBI F., Appellant, v. BRUCE N., Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 1, 1996

Citations

229 A.D.2d 392 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
645 N.Y.S.2d 65