From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Tirino v. Long Isl. Jewish-Hillside

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 16, 1984
99 A.D.2d 513 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Opinion

January 16, 1984


Proceeding pursuant to section 298 Exec. of the Executive Law to review a determination of the State Human Rights Appeal Board, dated May 19, 1983, which affirmed a determination of the State Division of Human Rights finding no probable cause to believe that the respondent, Long Island Jewish-Hillside Medical Center, engaged in an unlawful discriminatory practice. Determination confirmed and proceeding dismissed, without costs or disbursements. The record indicates that the division's field representative investigated the allegations of age discrimination in the complaint by reviewing the complaint itself and a letter from the associate personnel director of Long Island Jewish-Hillside Medical Center, by interviewing the associate personnel director, and by speaking with complainant when he visited the division office to review his file. Apparently, the field representative also reviewed a rebuttal letter from complainant's attorney. This letter was allegedly mailed to the division in December, 1981. In February, 1982, about one month after the division had issued its determination in this matter, complainant sent the division a copy of the letter, and asked that the matter be reopened so that the division could consider its contents. It seems that the field representative reviewed this letter at that time, although the matter was not reopened. The discretion accorded to the division in making its investigation was not abused in this case (see 9 NYCRR 465.6 [b]). Although the investigation of the complaint alleging age discrimination was not extensive, it was nevertheless not so abbreviated and one-sided that it resulted in a record which did not afford a reasonable basis for an administrative determination. (Cf. Belgrave v State Div. of Human Rights, 68 A.D.2d 922; Tenenbaum v State Div. of Human Rights, 50 A.D.2d 257.) Finally, on the state of the record before the division, it cannot be said that its finding of no probable cause was unsupported by substantial evidence. (See Distrigas of N Y Corp. v New York State Human Rights Appeal Bd., 80 A.D.2d 881.) Titone, J.P., Lazer, Mangano and Thompson, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Tirino v. Long Isl. Jewish-Hillside

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 16, 1984
99 A.D.2d 513 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)
Case details for

Matter of Tirino v. Long Isl. Jewish-Hillside

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JOSEPH TIRINO, Petitioner, v. LONG ISLAND JEWISH-HILLSIDE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 16, 1984

Citations

99 A.D.2d 513 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)