From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Timothy J. T. v. Karen J. H

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 10, 1998
251 A.D.2d 1036 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

June 10, 1998

Appeal from Order of Wayne County Family Court, Parenti, J. — Paternity.

Present — Pine, J. P., Lawton, Wisner, Callahan and Fallon, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: The record establishes that petitioner was the defendant in a divorce action in Supreme Court and that, in a verified answer therein, he denied the allegation of respondent that he was the father of her child. The parties entered into a stipulation of settlement pursuant to which respondent withdrew her allegation, and the stipulation was incorporated in the divorce, decree. The issue of paternity was resolved in the divorce action in accordance with the position petitioner took in his sworn answer in that action, and he had a full and fair opportunity to contest the issue. Thus, Family Court properly determined that petitioner is collaterally estopped from maintaining a paternity proceeding against respondent (see, Matter of Sandra I v. Harold I, 54 A.D.2d 1040, 1041-1042; see generally, Schwartz v. Public Adm'r of County of Bronx, 24 N.Y.2d 65, 71).


Summaries of

Matter of Timothy J. T. v. Karen J. H

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 10, 1998
251 A.D.2d 1036 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Matter of Timothy J. T. v. Karen J. H

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of TIMOTHY J. T., Appellant, v. KAREN J. H., Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jun 10, 1998

Citations

251 A.D.2d 1036 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
673 N.Y.S.2d 989

Citing Cases

Matter of Michael S. v. Karen J. K

Moreover, petitioner cannot make such a showing. This Court has previously held that petitioner's putative…