From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Tillow v. Daystrom Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 12, 1948
273 App. Div. 1045 (N.Y. App. Div. 1948)

Opinion

May 12, 1948.


Appeal by employer and insurance carrier from a decision and award of a referee in a workmen's compensation case. Claimant injured his back while lifting some material used or sold in his employment. He was given hospital treatment on two separate occasions without complete cure. All the physicians who have examined him, including his own, recommended that a myelogram test be performed to determine if a lumbar root protrusion exists. Claimant has refused to submit to such a test. There is medical testimony to the effect that his refusal to submit to such a test is unreasonable and there is no evidence to the contrary, except fear expressed by claimant. The decision appealed from directs the employer and carrier to provide claimant with psychiatric treatment to persuade him to take the test. Award and decision reversed on the law, without costs, and matter remitted to the Workmen's Compensation Board. Hill, P.J., Heffernan, Brewster, Foster and Deyo, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Tillow v. Daystrom Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 12, 1948
273 App. Div. 1045 (N.Y. App. Div. 1948)
Case details for

Matter of Tillow v. Daystrom Corporation

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of JAY TILLOW, Respondent, against DAYSTROM…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: May 12, 1948

Citations

273 App. Div. 1045 (N.Y. App. Div. 1948)

Citing Cases

Matter of Peasley v. Wendling Iron Works

The board held that his refusal was not unreasonable and this court affirmed the award based on this finding.…

Zanotti v. N.Y. Tel. Co.

The myelogram itself is not hazardous and claimant has had two babies in the interim yet she rejects the…