From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Tietjen v. Wingate

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 1, 1935
244 App. Div. 806 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)

Opinion

May, 1935.

Present — Lazansky, P.J., Young, Carswell, Tompkins and Johnston, JJ.


Motion for an alternative order of prohibition directed to the surrogate of the county of Kings and commanding him to refrain from proceeding further with respect to the vacating of an order confirming an adoption denied in the exercise of discretion. Should the surrogate's decision be adverse to the moving party, he can bring the question up on an abridged record, as pointed out in Capone v. Matteo Realty Corporation ( 241 App. Div. 845).


Summaries of

Matter of Tietjen v. Wingate

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 1, 1935
244 App. Div. 806 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)
Case details for

Matter of Tietjen v. Wingate

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Application of JAMES M. TIETJEN, Petitioner, for a…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 1, 1935

Citations

244 App. Div. 806 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)