From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Thomas

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 18, 1940
259 App. Div. 736 (N.Y. App. Div. 1940)

Opinion

March 18, 1940.


In three consolidated proceedings brought by minority stockholders of appellant Brooklyn-Manhattan Transit Corporation, to have their stock appraised and purchased by the corporation, under sections 20-21 of the Stock Corporation Law, the Special Term granted the application and directed among other things that the appraisal should commence on January 4, 1940. Order modified by directing that the first meeting of the appraisers shall be held within five days after the Transit Commission declares the Unification Plan operative, and by directing further that the appraisers shall estimate the value of petitioners' stock as of the date when the plan is thus declared operative. As so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs. We do not construe the statute to mean that the non-consenting stockholders acquire an absolute right to have their stock appraised and paid for as soon as their dissent has been filed and the sale has been approved by the requisite number of stockholders. They acquire immediately the right to commence the statutory proceeding ( Matter of Stockwell, 210 App. Div. 753); but the right to an appraisal is "subject to the conditions and provisions of section twenty-one" (Stock Corp. Law, § 20) and the provisions of section 21 include an application to the court. Upon such application the court has some measure of discretion. ( Matter of Bickerton v. N.Y. Theatre Co., 232 N.Y. 1; Matter of Leventall, 241 App. Div. 277.) If the sale is abandoned during the pendency of the proceeding, the application may be denied. ( Matter of Millard, Nos. 1-3, 221 App. Div. 113; affd., 246 N.Y. 546.) Where, as in this case, the sale is contingent upon future events and may ultimately be abandoned, we hold that the court has power to defer the actual appraisal until the contingencies are removed, bearing in mind the purposes of the statute as stated in Matter of Timmis ( 200 N.Y. 177). The contingencies will be removed when the Transit Commission declares the plan operative, and the appraisal should commence at that time. Lazansky, P.J., Hagarty, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur. [See post, p. 833 and p. 843.]


Summaries of

Matter of Thomas

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 18, 1940
259 App. Div. 736 (N.Y. App. Div. 1940)
Case details for

Matter of Thomas

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Application of W.K. THOMAS and HAROLD GROSS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 18, 1940

Citations

259 App. Div. 736 (N.Y. App. Div. 1940)

Citing Cases

Texas Co. v. Z. M. Independent Oil Co.

No authority is cited which supports this extraordinary interpretation of section 20. An option is an…

Texas Co. v. Z. M. Independent Oil Co.

The option was later exercised. See also Matter of Thomas, 259 App. Div. 736, 18 N.Y.S.2d 314. Defendant also…