Opinion
June 27, 1950.
Appeal from Appellate Division of the Supreme Court for the Third Judicial Department.
Present — Foster, P.J., Heffernan, Brewster, Deyo and Bergan, JJ.
The evidence is sufficient to sustain the determination that no restaurant, as the same is defined in subdivision 27 of section 3 Alco. Bev. Cont. of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law, is being conducted on the premises. There is no indication that the State Liquor Authority acted unreasonably, arbitrarily or in bad faith. Determination unanimously confirmed and petition dismissed, without costs.