From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of the Marriage of Laetzsch

Oregon Court of Appeals
Aug 1, 1978
581 P.2d 963 (Or. Ct. App. 1978)

Opinion

No. 98270, CA 9826

Argued June 22, 1978.

Affirmed as modified August 1, 1978.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Marion County, Joseph B. Felton, Senior Judge.

Laurie K. Smith, Eugene, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

J. Phillip Parks, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Miller, Beck Parks, Salem.

Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Lee and Joseph, Judges.


Affirmed as modified. No costs to either party.

LEE, J.


In this dissolution proceeding husband contends, inter alia, that a temporary child support order remained in effect until entry of the written decree and that the trial court erred in awarding wife attorney fees and costs.

In a preliminary hearing on February 28, 1977, husband was ordered to pay $75 per month per child temporary support for each of the two children. Trial was held August 4, 1977. On August 18, 1977, the court announced its decision and ordered that husband pay support of $125 per month for each of the two children. Thereafter, a written dissolution decree was entered which contained the language "Signed nunc pro tunc September 2, 1977" — "DATED" November 25, 1977, and included a provision that husband pay $125 per month for the support of each child commencing on the 10th day of September, 1977. Husband seeks substitution of "December" for "September" as the effective month for the commencement of the increased support. Wife agrees. We adopt that consensual modification.

Without detailing the property division, which appears to us to have favored the wife, we find that it would be just to relieve the husband of the judgment for attorney fees and costs. We do so. Otherwise, we find no reason to disturb the decree. McCoy and McCoy, 28 Or. App. 919, 562 P.2d 207, 29 Or. App. 287, 563 P.2d 738 (1977).

Affirmed as modified. No costs to either party.


Summaries of

Matter of the Marriage of Laetzsch

Oregon Court of Appeals
Aug 1, 1978
581 P.2d 963 (Or. Ct. App. 1978)
Case details for

Matter of the Marriage of Laetzsch

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Marriage of LAETZSCH, Respondent, and LAETZSCH…

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Aug 1, 1978

Citations

581 P.2d 963 (Or. Ct. App. 1978)
581 P.2d 963