From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of the Claim of Preston

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Oct 31, 2002
298 A.D.2d 823 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

91696

Decided and Entered: October 31, 2002.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed August 29, 2001, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.

Jeffrey M. Preston, appellant pro se.

Bond, Schoeneck King L.L.P., Syracuse (Laura H. Harshbarger of counsel), for ARG Trucking Company, Inc., respondent.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, New York City (Linda D. Joseph of counsel), for Commissioner of Labor, respondent.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Peters, Spain and, Carpinello, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board finding that claimant voluntarily left his employment without good cause. Claimant resigned from his employment as a driver for a transportation company after the employer refused to pay him based upon the actual miles driven to a location in Massachusetts. It is well settled that dissatisfaction with one's work assignment or wages does not constitute good cause for leaving employment (see Matter of Dragoi [Commissioner of Labor], 288 A.D.2d 685; Matter of Preus [Commissioner of Labor], 252 A.D.2d 715). Here, the record establishes that, regardless of the route taken, the employer paid its drivers at a mileage rate determined by the "commercial book miles" rather than the actual miles driven. Although claimant maintains that the employer gave him a set of directions to the location in Massachusetts and agreed to pay him based upon the actual miles driven on this particular run, the employer's testimony to the contrary created a credibility issue for the Board to resolve (see Matter of Mondiello [Commissioner of Labor], 268 A.D.2d 762). To the extent that claimant maintains that certain documents are missing from the record, a review of the hearing transcript establishes that such documents were never admitted into evidence. In any event, the contents thereof were testified to at the hearing.

Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Peters, Spain and Carpinello, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

Matter of the Claim of Preston

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Oct 31, 2002
298 A.D.2d 823 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

Matter of the Claim of Preston

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of JEFFERY M. PRESTON, Appellant. ARG TRUCKING…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Oct 31, 2002

Citations

298 A.D.2d 823 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
749 N.Y.S.2d 328