From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Taylor v. Tippett

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jan 19, 1967
27 A.D.2d 703 (N.Y. App. Div. 1967)

Opinion

January 19, 1967

Appeal from the Erie Supreme Court.

Present — Williams, P.J., Bastow, Goldman, Del Vecchio and Marsh, JJ.


Order unanimously reversed, without costs, and respondent directed to furnish appellant with transcript of preliminary hearing. Memorandum: Appellant, an indigent inmate of a State Prison, brought this proceeding to compel respondent, a Justice of the Peace, to furnish him with a transcript of proceedings of a hearing upon which appellant was held to await Grand Jury action upon a felony charge of which he was subsequently indicted and convicted. Section 206 of the Code of Criminal Procedure provides that if a defendant be held to answer a charge at such a hearing he is entitled upon payment of a stated fee to be furnished with certain described papers. If appellant were capable of paying for these documents he would have, as the prosecution concedes, an unquestioned right thereto. "When the state constitutionally or statutorily affords a defendant a right, the exercise thereof cannot be conditioned upon the defendant's ability to pay [citing cases]." ( People v. Montgomery, 18 N.Y.2d 993.) In the absence of an answer from respondent the direction contained in the order to be entered herein is based upon the assumption that the papers are in existence and in the possession of the Magistrate.


Summaries of

Matter of Taylor v. Tippett

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jan 19, 1967
27 A.D.2d 703 (N.Y. App. Div. 1967)
Case details for

Matter of Taylor v. Tippett

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of WILBUR TAYLOR, Appellant, v. JAMES L. TIPPETT, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jan 19, 1967

Citations

27 A.D.2d 703 (N.Y. App. Div. 1967)

Citing Cases

People v. Simpson

Present — Williams, P.J., Bastow, Henry, Del Vecchio and Marsh, JJ. Order unanimously reversed and motion…

People v. Payne

It follows, then, the court reasoned, that the same absolute right may not be denied to a defendant because…