Opinion
PER CURIAM.
The Petition for the Reinstatement of Patrick R. Taylor, having been filed on May 2, 1975, was referred to the Disciplinary Commission of this Court, and said Petition was afforded the opportunity of a hearing before the Disciplinary Commission; said hearing was before five of the six members of the Disciplinary Commission and held on July 11, 1975, and the Record of said hearing was filed with the Clerk's Office on August 21, 1975. The Record of that hearing forms the basis for the 'Findings of Facts and Recommendations' of the Disciplinary Commission, which, in part, are as follows:
FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The Disciplinary Commission pursuant to Section 18 of Admission and Discipline Rule 23 of this Court respectfully submits to this Court as follows:
On March 21, 1973, the Supreme Court of Indiana In the Matter of Patrick R. Taylor, Cause No. 672S78, issued an order suspending Mr. Taylor from the practice of law in this state for two (2) years, subject to his application for readmission, in accordance with the rules of this Court. On May 2, 1975, Mr. Taylor filed with the Supreme Court a Petition for Reinstatement.
This matter was set for hearing before the Disciplinary Commission pursuant to Section 18 of Admission and Discipline Rule 23 on July 11, 1975, in the office of the Disciplinary Commission, Room 814, Indiana State Teachers Association Building, 150 West Market Street, Indianapolis, Indiana.
The Disciplinary Commission finds that the Petitioner established at the hearing the following by clear and convincing evidence:
1. He desires in good faith to obtain restoration of his privilege to practice law.
2. His term of suspension prescribed in the order of suspension has elapsed. 3. He has not practiced law in this state or attempted to do so since he was disciplined.
4. He has complied fully with the terms of the order for discipline.
5. His attitude towards the misconduct for which he was disciplined is one of genuine remorse.
6. His conduct since the discipline was imposed has been exemplary and above reproach.
7. He has a proper understanding of and attitude towards the standards that are imposed upon members of the Bar and will conduct himself in conformity with such standards.
8. He can safely be recommended to the legal profession, the courts, and the public as a person fit to be consulted by others and to represent them and otherwise act in matters of trust and confidence, and in general to aid in the administration of justice as a member of the Bar and as an officer of the courts.
The Disciplinary Commission, based upon the Petitioner's compliance with the requirements of Section 4 of Admission and Discipline Rule 23, recommends to the Court that Patrick R. Taylor be reinstated to the practice of law in this state. . . .
This Court has carefully considered the foregoing findings of its Disciplinary Commission and finds the same to be true and correct with respect to each factual determination and, therefore, orders Patrick R. Taylor reinstated to the practice of law, said reinstatement to be unconditional and to be from the date of this order.
All Justices concur.