Matter of Tarik

1 Citing case

  1. Matter of William

    220 A.D.2d 740 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

    The Family Court's decision with respect to the disposition demonstrated that it carefully considered the least restrictive alternative consistent with the needs of the juvenile and the need for protection of the community. Accordingly, it cannot be said that the Family Court improvidently exercised its discretion in placing the appellant with the Division for Youth (see, Family Ct Act § 352.2; Matter of Tarik R., 217 A.D.2d 584; Matter of Jason W., 207 A.D.2d 495). Mangano, P.J., Miller, Santucci and Hart, JJ., concur.