From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Tarbell v. Senkowski [3d Dept 1999

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 15, 1999
260 A.D.2d 807 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

April 15, 1999

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Clinton County) to review a determination of respondents which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Roy J. Tarbell, Dannemora, petitioner in person.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney-General (Nancy A. Spiegel of counsel), Albany, for respondents.

Before: MIKOLL, J.P., YESAWICH JR., PETERS and SPAIN, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

Following a tier II disciplinary hearing, petitioner, a prison inmate, was found guilty of verbally harassing a staff member and refusing a direct order as a result of an incident wherein he swore at Correction Officer T. Bezio and refused a direct order to lock in his cell. Petitioner's administrative appeal was unsuccessful and he thereafter commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging the determination of guilt. We confirm. The clear and detailed misbehavior report authored by Bezio, combined with her testimony at the hearing, was sufficient to substantiate the alleged misconduct (see, Matter of Foster v Coughlin, 76 N.Y.2d 964, 966). Petitioner's remaining contentions, including his claim of Hearing Officer bias, have been examined and, to the extent that they have been preserved for appellate review, found to be unpersuasive.

MIKOLL, J.P., YESAWICH JR., PETERS and SPAIN, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Matter of Tarbell v. Senkowski [3d Dept 1999

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 15, 1999
260 A.D.2d 807 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Matter of Tarbell v. Senkowski [3d Dept 1999

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ROY J. TARBELL, Petitioner, v. DANIEL A. SENKOWSKI, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Apr 15, 1999

Citations

260 A.D.2d 807 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
688 N.Y.S.2d 281

Citing Cases

Pride v. Cunningham

Included in the evidence presented at the disciplinary hearing were the misbehavior report and the testimony…

Beck v. Selsky

Moreover, while petitioner has failed to preserve his challenge to the sufficiency of the misbehavior report…