From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Tara O.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 2, 1995
213 A.D.2d 753 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

March 2, 1995

Appeal from the Family Court of Madison County (Humphreys, J.).


On this appeal from the order embodying Family Court's finding that respondent was responsible for the neglect of his girlfriend's infant daughter (born in 1991), the contentions advanced by respondent lack merit and do not warrant extended discussion. First, having been made aware that respondent received notice of the hearing (and, in fact, through his counsel worked out a proposed disposition of the petition) but failed to appear because of a "hangover", Family Court was authorized to proceed with the fact-finding hearing in respondent's absence (see, Family Ct Act § 1041, 1042; Matter of Geraldine Rose W., 196 A.D.2d 313, lv dismissed 84 N.Y.2d 967; Matter of Raymond Dean L., 109 A.D.2d 87). In any event, respondent's failure to submit an affidavit in support of an application for rehearing in Family Court bars him from raising the issue on appeal (see, Family Ct Act § 1042; Matter of Geraldine Rose W., supra). Second, the evidence produced at the fact-finding hearing, particularly the testimony of the child's great-grandmother, provided a sufficient basis for a finding that the child was neglected and that respondent was responsible therefor (see, Matter of Michelle S., 195 A.D.2d 721; Matter of Melissa R., 162 A.D.2d 754).

Cardona, P.J., White, Casey and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

In re Tara O.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 2, 1995
213 A.D.2d 753 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

In re Tara O.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of TARA O. and Others, Children Alleged to be Neglected…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Mar 2, 1995

Citations

213 A.D.2d 753 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
622 N.Y.S.2d 1009

Citing Cases

In re Sharay

Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The appellant contends…