Opinion
November, 1926.
Award reversed and claim dismissed, with costs against the State Industrial Board, on the ground that the entire injury was comprehended by the first award. All concur.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Matter of Tannenbaum v. Baudouine
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 1, 1926
218 App. Div. 792 (N.Y. App. Div. 1926)
Summaries of
Matter of Tannenbaum v. Baudouine
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 1, 1926
218 App. Div. 792 (N.Y. App. Div. 1926)
Case details for
Matter of Tannenbaum v. Baudouine
Case Details
Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of SIDNEY TANNENBAUM, Respondent, against…
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Date published: Nov 1, 1926
Citations
218 App. Div. 792 (N.Y. App. Div. 1926)
Citing Cases
Matter of Roular v. Henry Forge and Tool Company
This loss by atrophy, resulting from amputation and disuse, cannot be superadded to the previous award. (…