Opinion
January 3, 1991
Appeal from the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board.
There is substantial evidence in the record to support the determination that claimant's discharge resulted from misconduct in connection with his employment. The record establishes that claimant read part of the memorandum regarding his job performance even though he had previously been warned regarding the unauthorized use of co-workers' property. Furthermore, the conclusion that these actions were not inadvertent and that they were detrimental to the employer's interest is also supported by the record (see, Matter of Boulware [Ross], 47 N.Y.2d 928).
Decision affirmed, without costs. Casey, J.P., Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., Levine and Harvey, JJ., concur.