From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Tamara

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 17, 1996
228 A.D.2d 598 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

June 17, 1996

Appeal from the Family Court, Queens County (De Phillips, J.).


Ordered that the dispositional order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The appellant, putative father of Tamara H., is currently serving a sentence of 5 to 10 years in a New York State correctional facility for submerging Jonathan H.'s face in boiling water. In a fact-finding order dated April 13, 1993, the Family Court made a derivative finding of abuse by the appellant and in a dispositional order dated January 25, 1994, the court denied visitation with Tamara. On appeal he claims that the Family Court improperly denied him visitation with Tamara who is a half-sibling of the burn victim.

The Family Court properly denied the appellant's request on the grounds that such visitation would not be in the best interests of Tamara (see generally, Weiss v. Weiss, 52 N.Y.2d 170, 175; Matter of Mohammed v. Cortlandt County Dept. of Social Servs., 186 A.D.2d 908; Matter of Wise v. Del Toro, 122 A.D.2d 714).

We decline to reach the Law Guardian's claim that the appellant lacks standing to seek visitation (see, Family Ct Act § 1084) since that issue is raised for the first time on appeal and is not properly before this Court.

We have reviewed the appellant's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Miller, J.P., Pizzuto, Santucci and Hart, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Tamara

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 17, 1996
228 A.D.2d 598 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Matter of Tamara

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of TAMARA H. TIMOTHY C., Appellant; COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 17, 1996

Citations

228 A.D.2d 598 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
644 N.Y.S.2d 539

Citing Cases

Matter of Davis v. Davis

The County Court issued an order of protection against the father to remain away from the respondent mother…