From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Syosset Holding Corp. v. Schlimm

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 8, 1957
4 A.D.2d 766 (N.Y. App. Div. 1957)

Opinion

July 8, 1957

Present — Wenzel, Acting P.J., Beldock, Murphy, Ughetta and Hallinan, JJ.


In a proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Act to review a determination of the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Incorporated Village of Hempstead and to direct the issuance of a permit, the appeal is from an order annulling the determination and directing the issuance of the permit. The determination sought to be reviewed denied an application for a variance to erect a gasoline filling station. Order modified by striking therefrom the second ordering paragraph. As so modified order unanimously affirmed, without costs, and matter remitted to the zoning board of appeals for further factual evidence and findings based thereon which are susceptible of review as to the sufficiency of the supporting evidence. ( People ex rel. Fordham M.R. Church v. Walsh, 244 N.Y. 280, 287; Matter of Elite Dairy Prods. v. Ten Eyck, 271 N.Y. 488, 498.)


Summaries of

Matter of Syosset Holding Corp. v. Schlimm

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 8, 1957
4 A.D.2d 766 (N.Y. App. Div. 1957)
Case details for

Matter of Syosset Holding Corp. v. Schlimm

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of SYOSSET HOLDING CORP., Respondent, against CHARLES H…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 8, 1957

Citations

4 A.D.2d 766 (N.Y. App. Div. 1957)

Citing Cases

N. Shore Steak House v. Thomaston

A variance is an authority to a property owner to use property in a manner forbidden by the ordinance while a…

Matter of Von Gerichten v. Schermerhorn

This latter observation is of course only respondent's conclusion, without the assistance of factual…