From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Symmonds v. Leonardo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 10, 1988
138 A.D.2d 810 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Opinion

March 10, 1988

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Washington County (Berke, J.).


In January 1987, petitioner, an inmate at Washington Correctional Facility, filed a formal grievance complaining that there were no signs posted at the facility outlining inmate behavior and prohibitions in both English and Spanish as required by Correction Law § 138 (1). Following a hearing on the grievance, the Inmate Grievance Resolution Committee unanimously recommended that such signs be posted and that recommendation was appealed to the Superintendent of the facility. The Superintendent denied the grievance and petitioner appealed to the Central Office Review Committee (hereinafter CORC). The appeal was subsequently denied.

Although the grievance procedures delineated in Correction Law § 139 and 7 NYCRR 701.11 provide for CORC decisions to be referred to the Commission of Correction and, ultimately, to the Commissioner of Correctional Services for final review, petitioner commenced a CPLR article 78 proceeding without going through those steps, contending that further administrative review would be futile. Respondents moved to dismiss the petition on the ground that petitioner had failed to exhaust his administrative remedies under 7 NYCRR 701.11 (d). Supreme Court granted respondents' motion and dismissed the petition without prejudice. This appeal ensued.

In our view, the petition was properly dismissed. Although petitioner correctly points out that the Commission of Correction's recommendation would not be binding on the Commissioner of Correctional Services, that does not render these administrative steps futile. The consideration of the matter by the Commission of Correction is a prerequisite to review by the Commissioner of Correctional Services, who does have the power to reverse CORC decisions and issues the final administrative determination (see, Correction Law § 139; 7 NYCRR 701.11 [d]). Moreover, there is nothing in the record which indicates that the Commissioner of Correctional Services has predetermined this issue. Hence, petitioner has failed to show that further pursuit of administrative remedies would be futile (see, Matter of Grattan v. Department of Social Servs., 131 A.D.2d 191, 193).

Judgment affirmed, without costs. Mahoney, P.J., Weiss, Yesawich, Jr., Levine and Harvey, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Symmonds v. Leonardo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 10, 1988
138 A.D.2d 810 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)
Case details for

Matter of Symmonds v. Leonardo

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of MICHAEL SYMMONDS, Appellant, v. ARTHUR A. LEONARDO, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Mar 10, 1988

Citations

138 A.D.2d 810 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Citing Cases

Matter of Harrison v. Leonardo

We reach this result on the basis of the court's conclusion that petitioner failed to properly pursue the…

Matter of Abdul-Matiyn v. Coughlin

We agree with Supreme Court's conclusion that petitioner failed to exhaust his administrative remedies with…