From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Sweet v. Schiller

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 3, 2000
271 A.D.2d 450 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Submitted February 22, 2000.

April 3, 2000.

In a proceeding pursuant to Mental Hygiene Law article 81 for the appointment of a guardian, David Schiller appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Rossetti, J.), entered April 26, 1999, which denied his motion to dismiss the proceeding on the ground that the Supreme Court lacks subject matter and personal jurisdiction.

David Schiller, Forest Hills, N.Y., appellant pro se.

CORNELIUS J. O'BRIEN, J.P., DAVID S. RITTER, THOMAS R. SULLIVAN, NANCY E. SMITH, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the appellant's contentions, the Supreme Court has subject matter and personal jurisdiction in this proceeding (see, Mental Hygiene Law §§ 81.04, 81.05 Mental Hyg., 81.07 Mental Hyg.; Matter of Eichner, 73 A.D.2d 431, mod 52 N.Y.2d 363, cert denied, 454 U.S. 858 ).


Summaries of

Matter of Sweet v. Schiller

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 3, 2000
271 A.D.2d 450 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Matter of Sweet v. Schiller

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF MARTHA SWEET, respondent, v. DAVID SCHILLER, appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 3, 2000

Citations

271 A.D.2d 450 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
706 N.Y.S.2d 899

Citing Cases

In re Brandon D.

81.05[a]; 83.17[a]; Matter of Verna HH., 302 A.D.2d 714, 715; Matter of Sweet v Schiller, 271 A.D.2d 450,…

Geneva D. v. Robert L.D. (In re Brandon D.)

Hence, the Supreme Court had subject matter jurisdiction in this proceeding. Brandon D. had been residing in…