From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Sumpter v. White Plains Hous. Auth

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 8, 1971
36 A.D.2d 728 (N.Y. App. Div. 1971)

Summary

In Matter of Sumpter v. White Plains Housing Auth. (36 A.D.2d 728, affd. 29 N.Y.2d 420, cert. den. 406 U.S. 928) the issue before us concerned the rights of a rejected applicant for public housing.

Summary of this case from Spady v. Mount Vernon Housing Authority

Opinion

March 8, 1971


In a proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the CPLR to review appellant's determination which rejected petitioner's application to rent a housing accommodation in appellant's Winbrook Apartments, the appeal (by permission) is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated August 7, 1970, which annulled the determination and remanded the matter to appellant for "a full evidentiary hearing". Judgment reversed, on the law, without costs; petition granted only to the extent that the matter is remitted to appellant for action consistent with section 156-a Pub. Hous. of the Public Housing Law. The record reveals that appellant, in rejecting petitioner's application, failed to comply with section 156-a Pub. Hous. of the Public Housing Law, which requires that an applicant who is determined ineligible for public housing shall be informed that he may be apprised of the reason or reasons therefor at a personal interview at appellant's office. In our view, the administrative complications and burdens attendant upon the various housing authorities in the State preclude the rigid requirement ordered by Special Term for "a full evidentiary hearing" in each case of rejection. Upon the oral argument of this proceeding the attorney for the amicus curiae New York City Housing Authority [the operations of which will be directly affected by that ruling] pointed out that at least 9,411 applications for public housing in New York City were rejected during 1970. Nothing contained in Matter of Williams v. White Plains Housing Auth. ( 62 Misc.2d 613, affd. 35 A.D.2d 965) requires a contrary holding, since that case involved the eviction of a tenant already in public housing. Rabin, P.J., Latham, Christ, Brennan and Benjamin, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Sumpter v. White Plains Hous. Auth

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 8, 1971
36 A.D.2d 728 (N.Y. App. Div. 1971)

In Matter of Sumpter v. White Plains Housing Auth. (36 A.D.2d 728, affd. 29 N.Y.2d 420, cert. den. 406 U.S. 928) the issue before us concerned the rights of a rejected applicant for public housing.

Summary of this case from Spady v. Mount Vernon Housing Authority
Case details for

Matter of Sumpter v. White Plains Hous. Auth

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of WILLIE SUMPTER, Respondent, v. WHITE PLAINS HOUSING…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 8, 1971

Citations

36 A.D.2d 728 (N.Y. App. Div. 1971)

Citing Cases

Spady v. Mount Vernon Housing Authority

Thus, we held that minimal due process standards must be read into the relevant regulation: "Among these…

Matter of Velez v. Christian

Petitioner also argues that she was denied an informal hearing of the issues in violation of her due process…