From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Sucato v. Town Board of Boston

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 18, 1992
187 A.D.2d 1045 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

November 18, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Erie County, Sedita, J.

Present — Green, J.P., Pine, Boehm, Fallon and Doerr, JJ.


Judgment unanimously reversed on the law with costs, motion denied and petition reinstated. Memorandum: In this CPLR article 78 proceeding, petitioner challenges the determination of the respondent Town Board that denied his building permit application for the construction of a multiple family dwelling. In granting respondents' motion for summary judgment, Supreme Court determined that the 30-day limitation period for review of planning board approval of site plans was applicable to this special proceeding, rendering it untimely (see, Town Law § 274-a). That was error. Because the petition seeks to review the determination of the Town Board, the four-month limitation period of CPLR 217 applies. When measured against that statute, the proceeding was timely commenced.


Summaries of

Matter of Sucato v. Town Board of Boston

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 18, 1992
187 A.D.2d 1045 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

Matter of Sucato v. Town Board of Boston

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JUSTIN D. SUCATO, Appellant, v. TOWN BOARD OF BOSTON et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 18, 1992

Citations

187 A.D.2d 1045 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
590 N.Y.S.2d 363

Citing Cases

Young Dev., Inc. v. Town of West Seneca

Preliminarily, we reject respondents' contention that the petition was not timely filed within 30 days of the…

Royal Mgmt., Inc. v. Town of West Seneca

We reject that contention. “Because the petition seeks to review the determination of the Town Board, the…