From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Strong v. Randall

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 16, 1904
69 N.E. 721 (N.Y. 1904)

Opinion

Argued February 8, 1904

Decided February 16, 1904

Frank E. Blackwell for motion.

Willard Parker Butler, Sanford Robinson and Julius F. Workum opposed.


While we are of opinion that proceedings taken under section 915 of the Code of Civil Procedure to punish a witness for contempt in failing to give testimony for use in actions or suits in other states constitute a special proceeding within the definition of the Code, we are also of opinion that the order from which the present appeal is taken, which merely directs the witness to answer specified questions, is interlocutory in its character. The final order in the proceeding will be that which either punishes or refuses to punish the witness for contempt, should he persist in his refusal to testify, and it is such an order only that is appealable to this court, as a matter of right.

The appeal should be dismissed, with costs, and ten dollars costs of motion.

PARKER, Ch. J., GRAY, O'BRIEN, HAIGHT, MARTIN, VANN and CULLEN, JJ., concur.

Appeal dismissed.


Summaries of

Matter of Strong v. Randall

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 16, 1904
69 N.E. 721 (N.Y. 1904)
Case details for

Matter of Strong v. Randall

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Application of WILLIAM E. STRONG et al., Respondents…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Feb 16, 1904

Citations

69 N.E. 721 (N.Y. 1904)
69 N.E. 721

Citing Cases

Matter of Williams

Rule 136 is practically identical with former rule 17 of the former General Rules of Practice. The decision…

Matter of Steinman v. Conlon

" And of the later cases decided since the adoption of this provision and holding that a proceeding to punish…