From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Straniere v. Cutolo

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Aug 31, 1977
42 N.Y.2d 984 (N.Y. 1977)

Opinion

Argued August 30, 1977

Decided August 31, 1977

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, JOHN A. GARBARINO, J.

Jeremiah B. McKenna for appellant. Lawrence A. Mandelker for respondents.


MEMORANDUM.

Order affirmed, without costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division. The failure to join the objector Molinaro is not fatal. His objections were not reviewed by the Board of Elections. Under the circumstances of this case the objector Molinaro is not a necessary party since the aggrieved candidate himself has presented the issues for review (cf. Matter of Butler v Hayduk, 37 N.Y.2d 497).

Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and COOKE concur.

Order affirmed, without costs, in a memorandum.


Summaries of

Matter of Straniere v. Cutolo

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Aug 31, 1977
42 N.Y.2d 984 (N.Y. 1977)
Case details for

Matter of Straniere v. Cutolo

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ROBERT STRANIERE, Appellant, v. EUGENE A. CUTOLO et al.…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Aug 31, 1977

Citations

42 N.Y.2d 984 (N.Y. 1977)
398 N.Y.S.2d 409
368 N.E.2d 32

Citing Cases

Stevenson v. Bd. of Elections

In opposition, Stevenson argues that Jung is an "irrelevant objector" and not a necessary party to this…

Wein v. Molinari

Service on Hart was not required since he had not joined as an objector in the proceeding to invalidate the…