From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Stowell v. Santoro

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 11, 1938
17 N.E.2d 108 (N.Y. 1938)

Opinion

Argued October 5, 1938

Decided October 11, 1938

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

Benjamin Shedler, Meyer W. Greenwald and Herbert Peterfreund for appellant.

Frank A. Saporito and Mario D. Nicolais for respondents.


The record shows that the village trustees voted that the petitioner was guilty of the acts alleged only by the first charge. This charge was not considered at the Appellate Division. It was there held that the evidence amply sustained the other charges. The record, however, does not show that any action was taken by the trustees on those charges.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and the matter remitted to the Appellate Division for further consideration and disposition in accordance with this opinion, without costs.

CRANE, Ch. J., O'BRIEN, HUBBS, LOUGHRAN, FINCH and RIPPEY, JJ., concur; LEHMAN, J., taking no part.

Ordered accordingly.


Summaries of

Matter of Stowell v. Santoro

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 11, 1938
17 N.E.2d 108 (N.Y. 1938)
Case details for

Matter of Stowell v. Santoro

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of CHARLES H. STOWELL, Appellant, against BATTISTA SANTORO…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 11, 1938

Citations

17 N.E.2d 108 (N.Y. 1938)
17 N.E.2d 108

Citing Cases

Matter of Stowell v. Santoro

February 14, 1939. Proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act, to review the determination of the…