Matter of Stillman

1 Citing case

  1. Matter of Stenstrom

    194 A.D.2d 277 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)   Cited 6 times

    Further, respondent's belated attempt to correct office deficiencies does not negate our determination that respondent lacks the capacity to practice law in an ethical and professional manner. Accordingly, we conclude that respondent's pervasive and serious misconduct warrants disbarment (see, Matter of Giangrande, 177 A.D.2d 141; Matter of Stillman, 128 A.D.2d 243; Matter of Hunter, 120 A.D.2d 214). PINE, BALIO, LAWTON, DAVIS and BOEHM, JJ., concur.