From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Stiles v. Phelan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 30, 1985
111 A.D.2d 591 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

May 30, 1985

Appeal from the Supreme Court, St. Lawrence County.


Petitioner, a probation officer for St. Lawrence County, was charged with misconduct under Civil Service Law § 75 for threatening his wife and children with bodily harm and death. After a hearing, the charge, found to be job related due to petitioner's employment in a law enforcement position, was sustained. The hearing officer recommended that, inter alia, petitioner be suspended for a total of 60 days and fined $600. Respondent Peter Phelan, the Director of the County's Probation Department, imposed only a 30-day suspension, without a fine, and required that petitioner continue receiving professional help and that the results of the hearing be placed in petitioner's personnel file. To challenge this determination, petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding, which has been transferred to this court.

Petitioner's claim that his wife's supporting deposition was improperly admitted into evidence at the hearing because it did not qualify under the business record exception to the hearsay rule is without merit. Compliance with the technical rules of evidence is not required in hearings such as the one afforded petitioner (Civil Service Law § 75). A sufficient foundation for the deposition was presented through the testimony of the investigating deputy sheriff, which revealed that petitioner's wife dictated and signed the deposition. The contents of the deposition of petitioner's wife support the charge and this evidence, considered in conjunction with the testimony of the investigating deputy and respondent Phelan, is more than uncorroborated hearsay such as that found in Matter of Eppler v Van Alstyne ( 93 A.D.2d 930, appeal discontinued 60 N.Y.2d 703), upon which petitioner erroneously relies. Accordingly, there is substantial evidence to support the administrative determination ( see, Matter of Eagle v. Paterson, 57 N.Y.2d 831, 833).

Determination confirmed, and petition dismissed, without costs. Main, J.P., Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., Levine and Harvey, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Stiles v. Phelan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 30, 1985
111 A.D.2d 591 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

Matter of Stiles v. Phelan

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of RICHARD STILES, Petitioner, v. PETER PHELAN et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: May 30, 1985

Citations

111 A.D.2d 591 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Citing Cases

Matter of Lewis v. Chesworth

In Trayner's May 2, 1985 statement, she alleged that petitioner assaulted her. Since he was eventually…

In the Matter of Correll v. Bucci

We are unpersuaded by petitioner's argument that the findings of misconduct are not supported by substantial…