From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of State Farm Ins. Comp. v. Smith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 9, 1998
255 A.D.2d 386 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

November 9, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Bucaria, J.).


The record indicates that the petitioner had ample time to seek discovery of the respondent as provided for in the underlying insurance policy, and that its failure to do so was unjustified. Thus, the petitioner should not have been granted a temporary stay of arbitration in order to obtain such discovery ( see, Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. v. Garcia, 251 A.D.2d 500; Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. v. Faulk, 250 A.D.2d 674; Matter of Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. DeCaro, 244 A.D.2d 487; Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. v. Urena, 208 A.D.2d 623; cf., Matter of Metropolitan Prop. Cas. Ins. Co. v. Keeney, 241 A.D.2d 455).

Rosenblatt, J. P., O'Brien, Sullivan, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of State Farm Ins. Comp. v. Smith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 9, 1998
255 A.D.2d 386 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Matter of State Farm Ins. Comp. v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of STATE FARM INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent, v. DOROTHY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 9, 1998

Citations

255 A.D.2d 386 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
679 N.Y.S.2d 702

Citing Cases

Matter, Interboro Mut. Indemy. Ins. v. Pardon

The Supreme Court properly denied that branch of the petition which was for a temporary stay of arbitration…

In re Connecticut Indemnity Insurance

Memorandum: In this proceeding commenced pursuant to CPLR article 75, Supreme Court did not improvidently…