From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of St. Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. v. Hollis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 24, 1996
228 A.D.2d 685 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

June 24, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McCaffrey, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly granted the petitioner's application to stay arbitration. Underinsured motorists benefits are available when the bodily injury liability limits of the offending vehicle are less than the bodily injury liability limits of the insured's policy ( see, Insurance Law § 3420 [f] [2]; Maurizzio v. Lumbermens Mut. Cas. Co., 73 N.Y.2d 951; Matter of Federal Ins. Co. v. Reingold, 181 A.D.2d 769). Here the bodily injury liability limits of $100,000 per person and $300,000 per accident in the appellants' policy were equal to the bodily injury liability limits of the offending vehicle's policy. Thus, the underinsured motorist endorsement of the petitioner's policy is not triggered. O'Brien, J.P., Ritter, Pizzuto and Altman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of St. Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. v. Hollis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 24, 1996
228 A.D.2d 685 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Matter of St. Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. v. Hollis

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 24, 1996

Citations

228 A.D.2d 685 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
646 N.Y.S.2d 29

Citing Cases

Wilson v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co.

Underinsurance benefits are available only if the bodily injury liability limits of the tortfeasor's policy…

Allstate Ins. Co. v. Rivera

I. The tortfeasor's vehicle does not qualify as an "uninsured motor vehicle." ( Matter of Prudential Prop.…