Opinion
March 26, 1992
Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County, Stuart C. Cohen, J.
Upon a review of the record, we find that there is substantial evidence to support respondent's determination that petitioner violated section 53.1 (p) of the Rules of the New York State Liquor Authority (9 N.Y.CRR) by unauthorized use of a trade name in connection with the licensed premises, and violated section 100 (4) of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law by unauthorized maintenance and operation of more than one stand-up bar on the licensed premises (CPLR 7803; Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 N.Y.2d 222).
We perceive no abuse of discretion by respondent in imposing the penalty herein (Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., supra).
Concur — Carro, J.P., Wallach, Kassal and Rubin, JJ.