From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Spratt v. Sweeney Gray Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 11, 1916
111 N.E. 1100 (N.Y. 1916)

Opinion

Argued November 15, 1915

Decided January 11, 1916

Merwyn H. Nellis, Andrew J. Nellis and James B. Henney for appellants.

Egburt E. Woodbury, Attorney-General ( E.C. Aiken of counsel), for respondent.


Order affirmed, with costs, on opinion in Matter of Post v. Burger Gohlke ( 216 N.Y. 544).

Concur: WILLARD BARTLETT, Ch. J., HISCOCK, CHASE, COLLIN, CARDOZO, SEABURY and POUND, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Spratt v. Sweeney Gray Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 11, 1916
111 N.E. 1100 (N.Y. 1916)
Case details for

Matter of Spratt v. Sweeney Gray Company

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of JOHN SPRATT, Respondent, against SWEENEY…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jan 11, 1916

Citations

111 N.E. 1100 (N.Y. 1916)
216 N.Y. 763

Citing Cases

Matter of Smith v. Aerovane Utilities Corp.

The contract of employment was made in the State of New York. On September 1, 1914, he was sent by his…

Matter of Cameron v. Ellis Construction Co.

Where a workman employed in work here is called upon, in the course of his employment, to perform transitory…